Politics of Civil Liberties
John E. Finn
Government 250
PAC 319 Wesleyan University
Ext 2493 Spring ‘04
jfinn@wesleyan.edu SYLLABUS TABLE OF CONTENTS I Introduction
1 II Reading Cases in Civil Liberties
2 III Books to
Purchase
2-3 IV Schedule of
Papers
3 V Grading &
Exams
3-4 VI Lecture Topics &
Assignments
4-6 I Introduction. Civil Liberties is designed to introduce students to a uniquely American,
and to some ways of thinking, a wonderfully naive contribution to politics:
The written specification of individual liberties and rights that citizens
possess and can juridically enforce against the state. Civil Liberties is not,
however, a course on law. It is instead a course in political science about
law, or a course that has as its subject the relationship of law to the most
fundamental sorts of questions about politics. During the semester, we shall see that most of the serious difficulties
(and there are many) in the politics of civil liberties arise from conflicts
between our commitment to two or more positive values. There are, for example,
inevitable and recurrent conflicts (despite our attempts to ignore them)
between the values of liberty and equality. As Felix Frankfurter once wrote,
these and other such conflicts are "what the Greeks thousands of years
ago recognized as a tragic issue, namely the clash of rights, not the clash of
wrongs." In this course, we examine these clashes in light of the broader
philosophical and institutional problems of the constitutional order. I hope
to show that constitutional "answers" to problems like those of
abortion, freedom of speech, and affirmative action require a coherent
understanding of the Constitution, and of the assumptions it makes about human
nature and the proper ends of government and civil society. We will, therefore, examine the doctrinal development of specific liberties
and rights, such as due process and privacy, but we shall consider them in a
broader theoretical context. We shall want to know what overall conception of
liberties, rights, and governmental powers most nearly reflects and promotes
our best understanding of the Constitution and the polity it both constitutes
and envisions. In addressing these issues we will confront a welter of
difficult and controversial questions. It is unlikely that we will succeed in
our attempts to answer them fully or finally. What we can hope to achieve,
however, is an improved and more sophisticated appreciation of the importance
(or not) of our commitment to civil liberties, and of the sacrifices we must
make if we choose to honor that commitment. II Reading Cases in Civil Liberties. Reading court cases is, for most of you, a new experience. Unfortunately,
it is not often (at least initially) a very pleasant experience. You may find
the reading a bit easier if you bear in mind the following inquiries: a. SUBSTANCE. What is the "law" after the case was decided? What
is the holding of the judges in the case? Is it consistent with prior
cases? How does the case fit into the "doctrine" on this subject
matter? b. ASSUMPTIONS. What assumptions does the opinion make to support its
argument? What does it assume, for example, about the Constitution? About
human nature? About the framers? Are these assumptions consistent with the
rest of the argument? Where is the reasoning deficient, unsupported, or
implausible? c. HISTORY. It is quite possible to see judicial opinions as political
artifacts, as "period pieces" that value ideas quaintly idealistic
or long since tarnished. Is history a relevant source of constitutional
meaning? d. JUDICIAL ROLES. Almost every significant case in civil liberties must
come to terms with questions about the proper role of the judiciary in a
constitutional democracy. As we shall see throughout the course, questions
about relative institutional competencies are central to a complete
understanding of the constitutional order. e. POLITICAL THEORY. Serious controversies in civil liberties require of
judges that they possess a conception of the nature of the American political
system and the importance of civil liberties to that system. Is that
conception--whether explicit or implicit--consistent with the result in the
case? Is it coherent? Is it desirable? III Books to Purchase. Required: The primary text for this course is Kommers, Finn & Jacobsohn, American
Constitutional Law: Essays, Cases, & Comparative Notes, 2d ed. (Rowman
& Littlefield, 2004). Unfortunately, the book will not arrive at Broad
Street Books until sometime in February. You may purchase it then, if you
wish. In the meantime, the chapters we will use are available at the following
website—you may download & print the chapters at your convenience: http://condor.wesleyan.edu/jfinn/g250jf.html In addition, please purchase or download: Hamilton et al., The
Federalist Papers. any edition Recommended: van Geel, Understanding Supreme Court Opinions. (2d ed.) IV Schedule of Papers. a) On Thursday, Feb. 5, I will describe in class how to brief a case. Every
student must submit a case brief on Tuesday, Feb. 10. b) On Tuesday, Feb. 17, I will hand out a short (4-6) page mini-moot court
exercise that I will describe more fully in lecture. In brief, the problem
will require that you prepare a bench memorandum for a judge that analyzes a
legal problem and offers a resolution of the problem in light of the
considerations described in the course readings and the Introduction to this
syllabus. This assignment is due on Thursday, Feb. 26. c) On Tuesday, March 2, I will hand out a moot court problem, assign
students to courts, and, if there are no volunteers, appoint counsel. Briefs
of counsel must be completed and duplicated for all members of the
court by Thursday, April 1. d) The moot courts will meet, at places, times, and dates to be determined
later, during the week of April 6-8. Attendance at one of
the moot courts is mandatory. Opinions of
the Court are due on Thursday, April 22. V Exams & Grading. In addition to the bench memorandum and the moot court exercise, there will
be a final examination. The bench memorandum is worth 10% of the course grade; The moot court is worth 40% of the course grade; and The final exam is worth 40% of the course grade. Class participation is worth 10% of the course grade. To avoid the inevitable problems engendered by late papers, I will strictly
enforce the following regulations: a) Students have three "days of grace" that they may use to shift submission deadlines for the case briefs, bench memoranda, and moot court opinions. Days of grace may not be used for Briefs of Counsel or the final examination. b) Papers turned in after the "days of grace" have run out will be penalized one full grade per day. There are no exceptions. c) Students must take and pass the final examination, at the time and
place determined by the Registrar’s Office, to pass the course. VI Lecture Topics & Assignments. January 22: Introduction & Administravia Assigned: The Constitution of the United States of America Jan 27-29: Interpreting the Constitution Assigned: KFJ, chapters 1 & 2 Bork, "Tradition & Morality in Constitutional Law" Brennan, "The Constitution: Contemporary Ratification" Feb 3-5: The Rise of Judicial Power Assigned: KFJ, chapter 3 Recommended: Arkes, Beyond the Constitution Burgess, The Contest for Authority Snowiss, Judicial review and the Law of the Constitution Fisher, Constitutional Dialogues Feb 10-12: The Bill of Rights & Incorporation Assigned: KFJ, chapter 9 Recommended: Richard Cortner, The Supreme Court and the Bill of Rights. Charles Fairman, "Does the Fourteenth Amendment Incorporate the Bill
of Rights"? Michael Curtis, No State Shall Abridge. Feb 17-19: Liberty and the Once (And Future?) Right to Property Assigned: KFJ, chapter 10 Recommended: Epstein, Takings Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law Ackerman, Property & the Constitution MacPherson, "Human Rights as Property Rights" Radin, "Property & personhood" Siegen, Economic Liberties & the Constitution Feb 24-26: The Right to Privacy Assigned: KFJ, chapter 11 Recommended: Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously Grey, "Eros, Civilization, and the Burger Court" Ely, "The Wages of Crying Wolf: Roe v. Wade" Glendon, Abortion & Divorce in Western Law Allen, Uneasy Access: Privacy for Women Brill, Nobody's Business Dworkin, Life's Dominion Garrow, Liberty & Sexuality Mar 2-4: Freedom of Speech, I Assigned: KFJ, chapter 12 Recommended: Recommended: Fish, There's No such Thing as Free Speech Schauer, Free Speech Bollinger, The Tolerant Society Levy, Emergence of a Free Press Shiffrin, The First Amendment, Democracy, and Romance Greenawalt, Fighting Words Mar 23-25: Freedom of Speech, II Assigned: KFJ, chapter 12 (continued) Recommended: Meiklejohn, Free Speech & its Relation to
Self-Government Davis, Decisions & Images Mr 30- Apr 1: The Religion Clauses, I Assigned: KFJ, chapter 13 Recommended: Locke, Letter on Toleration Choper, Securing Religious Liberty Howe, The Garden & the Wilderness Carter, The Culture of Disbelief Levy, The Religion Clauses Richards, Toleration & The Constitution Smith, Foreordained Failure Apr 6-8: MOOT COURTS Apr 13-15: The Religion Clauses, II Assigned: KFJ, chapter 13 (continued) Apr 20-22: The Equal Protection Clause—Race Assigned: KFJ, chapter 14 Recommended: Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously Fiss, "Groups & the Equal Protection Clause" Kluger, Simple Justice Gunther, "In Search of an Evolving Doctrine" Ely, "The Constitutionality of Reverse Discrimination" Apr 27-29: The Equal Protection Clause—Gender Assigned: KFJ, chapter 15 Recommended: Baer, The Fourteenth Amendment VanBurkleo, "Belonging to the World" May 4: The Constitution in Crisis Assigned: KFJ, chapter 5 Federalist Papers, #1 Recommended: Finn, Constitutions in Crisis Rossiter, Constitutional Dictatorship Becker, The Declaration of Independence Irons, Justice at War Smith, Democracy on Trial